<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: exf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exactfile.com/exf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exactfile.com</link>
	<description>Making sure that what you hash is what you get.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:55:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gomezie</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomezie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-450</guid>
		<description>@Brandon

Firstly thanks very much for this software.. I have been using EXF rather than the Gui version to take away the chance of user error, and also to instruct end users on using a check method correctly.

Can you please tell me.. is there a way to have a progress bar of sorts, whilst EXF is generating hashes?

Because I have used batch files with this, a user only sees a blank screen and assumes that it has &quot;crashed&quot; :0)

Thanks again!

Many Thanks
Gomezie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brandon</p>
<p>Firstly thanks very much for this software.. I have been using EXF rather than the Gui version to take away the chance of user error, and also to instruct end users on using a check method correctly.</p>
<p>Can you please tell me.. is there a way to have a progress bar of sorts, whilst EXF is generating hashes?</p>
<p>Because I have used batch files with this, a user only sees a blank screen and assumes that it has &#8220;crashed&#8221; :0)</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>Many Thanks<br />
Gomezie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zemke</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zemke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Hi again Brandon.

I did post a positive note about ExactFile over on the other web site I mentioned.  After thinking about the way photographers are likely to use your software a bit more, I have a feature request: Support &quot;shortcuts&quot; to folders as if they were native folders in your Create Digest and Check Digest scans.  

This would enable multi-volume collection support in the non-&quot;Professional&quot; versions of XP, Vista and probably Win 7.  It would also defuse some probable objections.

As you may know, it&#039;s increasingly popular to shoot in &quot;RAW&quot; mode with digital SLR&#039;s.  There are lots of image processing and quality advantages to doing so over JPEGs but it does produce lots of data.  My &quot;old&quot; Canon XTi records about 10 MB of compressed data per shot and my newer Canon 50D records about 30 MB per shot. Nikon, Olympus and ... SLR cameras produce similar amounts.  

The need for multi-volume disk support is here today for some.  I, and many others, are likely to need it in the near future. So if this request is reasonably easy to add, please consider it for your next version.

Thanks,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Brandon.</p>
<p>I did post a positive note about ExactFile over on the other web site I mentioned.  After thinking about the way photographers are likely to use your software a bit more, I have a feature request: Support &#8220;shortcuts&#8221; to folders as if they were native folders in your Create Digest and Check Digest scans.  </p>
<p>This would enable multi-volume collection support in the non-&#8221;Professional&#8221; versions of XP, Vista and probably Win 7.  It would also defuse some probable objections.</p>
<p>As you may know, it&#8217;s increasingly popular to shoot in &#8220;RAW&#8221; mode with digital SLR&#8217;s.  There are lots of image processing and quality advantages to doing so over JPEGs but it does produce lots of data.  My &#8220;old&#8221; Canon XTi records about 10 MB of compressed data per shot and my newer Canon 50D records about 30 MB per shot. Nikon, Olympus and &#8230; SLR cameras produce similar amounts.  </p>
<p>The need for multi-volume disk support is here today for some.  I, and many others, are likely to need it in the near future. So if this request is reasonably easy to add, please consider it for your next version.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zemke</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zemke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent program!  It&#039;s perfect for digital photographers interested in maintaining a reliable archive.

There are quite a few folks interested in validating images over time as part of Digital Asset Management.  A guy named Peter Krogh has a nice web site to discuss the topic at http://thedambook.com/

Yes the site name was picked to advertise a book, but the forum is also a good place to go to ask questions or discuss DAM issues.  In any case,  I&#039;m going to go over and suggest that folks take advantage of your wonderful software.

Thanks very much,

Dan

p.s. It was easy to make a small donation via PayPal by clicking your Donate button on the home page ;-}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent program!  It&#8217;s perfect for digital photographers interested in maintaining a reliable archive.</p>
<p>There are quite a few folks interested in validating images over time as part of Digital Asset Management.  A guy named Peter Krogh has a nice web site to discuss the topic at <a href="http://thedambook.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thedambook.com/</a></p>
<p>Yes the site name was picked to advertise a book, but the forum is also a good place to go to ask questions or discuss DAM issues.  In any case,  I&#8217;m going to go over and suggest that folks take advantage of your wonderful software.</p>
<p>Thanks very much,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
<p>p.s. It was easy to make a small donation via PayPal by clicking your Donate button on the home page ;-}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Version 1.0.1.6 fixes the problems reported with batch files. Due to the required changes to make it work properly with batch files, Unicode symbols will now show on screen as boxes. However, exf itself is still running with Unicode capability, and redirected output to a file will retain the full data, so this is not a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 1.0.1.6 fixes the problems reported with batch files. Due to the required changes to make it work properly with batch files, Unicode symbols will now show on screen as boxes. However, exf itself is still running with Unicode capability, and redirected output to a file will retain the full data, so this is not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Would be great if you could add &quot;exit code&quot; feature to exf. Many command line utilities has this feature, for example, RAR, even fSum has it. Let&#039;s say, 0 - means successful operation, 1 - Summing error occured, 2 - Fatal error, etc. etc. Exit code is very important when users are dealing with automation tasks. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be great if you could add &#8220;exit code&#8221; feature to exf. Many command line utilities has this feature, for example, RAR, even fSum has it. Let&#8217;s say, 0 &#8211; means successful operation, 1 &#8211; Summing error occured, 2 &#8211; Fatal error, etc. etc. Exit code is very important when users are dealing with automation tasks. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-234</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-214&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Brandon&lt;/a&gt; 
Need to say, great work! Thanks for coming up with this, very helpful for checking those large copies. I am seeing the same thing in that when I call exf.exe from a batch script the exf.exe command runs correctly but then closes the script. I am also seeing that if I run the batch script from an existing command session I can not run the script again till I close that session and open a new one. Hope that helps some.

Again, thank you for all the great work so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-214" rel="nofollow">@Brandon</a><br />
Need to say, great work! Thanks for coming up with this, very helpful for checking those large copies. I am seeing the same thing in that when I call exf.exe from a batch script the exf.exe command runs correctly but then closes the script. I am also seeing that if I run the batch script from an existing command session I can not run the script again till I close that session and open a new one. Hope that helps some.</p>
<p>Again, thank you for all the great work so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-221&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-221&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Foo Bar&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
Can you make a Linux port, 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, at least not for a while.  If Embarcadero gets a cross-platform compiler in place (as they are planning), I might do a command-line version.  But I don&#039;t use Linux so this will be an extremely low priority for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-221"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-221" rel="nofollow">Foo Bar</a> :</strong><br />
Can you make a Linux port,
</p></blockquote>
<p>No, at least not for a while.  If Embarcadero gets a cross-platform compiler in place (as they are planning), I might do a command-line version.  But I don&#8217;t use Linux so this will be an extremely low priority for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Nice program.  Can you make a Linux port, at least for the command-line version?  The multithreaded comp and extra hash functions would be a nice addition to the standard hash utils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice program.  Can you make a Linux port, at least for the command-line version?  The multithreaded comp and extra hash functions would be a nice addition to the standard hash utils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-213&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-213&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Len Linkens&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
I am trying to use exf within a batch file.  The program runs correctly but then exits the bat file without continuing on to the next command..  Is there a switch or something that would correct this behavior?
Len
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ll have to do some testing to see what is causing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-213"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-213" rel="nofollow">Len Linkens</a> :</strong><br />
I am trying to use exf within a batch file.  The program runs correctly but then exits the bat file without continuing on to the next command..  Is there a switch or something that would correct this behavior?<br />
Len
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to do some testing to see what is causing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Linkens</title>
		<link>http://www.exactfile.com/exf/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Linkens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exactfile.com/?page_id=49#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I am trying to use exf within a batch file.  The program runs correctly but then exits the bat file without continuing on to the next command..  Is there a switch or something that would correct this behavior?

Len</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to use exf within a batch file.  The program runs correctly but then exits the bat file without continuing on to the next command..  Is there a switch or something that would correct this behavior?</p>
<p>Len</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
